Addictions

come in all types. Typically we think of addiction in terms of substances/drugs/alcohol. But what about... bikes?

Webster's defines addicted as : to devote or surrender (oneself) to something habitually or obsessively <addicted to gambling.


Sounds like cycling would qualify as "habitual," at least when it is done regularly.

Addiction has a negative connotation, and typically refers to behaviors that are detrimental to ones physical well-being.

But saying I am addicted to bicycles and riding them obviates the positive cardiovascular and psychological benefits associated with our favorite form of exercise.

But what role do endorphins, the body's natural opiate-like secretions, play in our commitment to cycling? Learn more here. Endorphins bind to the body's opiate receptors in the brain to lessen perception of pain. They also produce euphoria.

But unlike chemical opiates (morphine, etc.) endorphins are NOT addictive. Since there is no evidence of physical dependence on these neurotransmitters, it must be a psychological craving. It's an addiction of the mind rather than the body.

On most of my rides I find myself in a state of mental neutrality. My usual thoughts and concerns are pushed into the background, and my thoughts are centered more in the "now," i.e. on what is happening (monitoring heart rate or respiration, reaching for a water bottle) or about to happen (like avoiding a pothole or piece of debris in the road, anticipating a shift because of the terrain.)

I also find I am addicted to perusing Craigslist and eBay bike ads, and this is probably more of the obsessive variety, as it is potentially harmful to my bank account! I've managed to satisfy my cravings by purchasing bike parts (wheelsets, shifters, etc.) when a good deal comes along. But I'm always checking out the full-bike ads, working out bids and offers in my head. Occasionally I lose my willpower and place a bid or offer on something.

Recently, I swapped my aluminum Trek 1500 for a vintage steel Bianchi Brava (in celeste, of course) in an even trade. The transaction was prompted by a desire I've always had for things Bianchi, especially when they come in celeste wrapping.

Was it a fair trade? From a capatalistic perspective, I probably got the proverbial "short end of the stick." From an aesthetic point of view, I got the sexier bike.

Which outcome is most "correct" depends on your perspective, I suppose.

After all, as long as it's legal and no one gets hurt, what's the harm?

Keep pedaling!